What Is a Good P/E Ratio?

Joan Sacdalan
Reviewed by Nizar Assanie 18 min read
Black cover with the TruthSayer AI logo, the title What Is a Good P/E Ratio, the figure 17.1× average S&P 500 P/E, 1960–2025 and the line: Compare it with sector, rates and growth.

A good P/E ratio is one that is at or below what similar companies trade at, once you account for growth, debt and interest rates. There is no single good number. As a market yardstick, the S&P 500's trailing P/E averaged 17.1× at year-ends from 1960 to 2025, and it stood at 25.2× at the end of 2025.

The price-to-earnings ratio is the most quoted number in investing, and one of the most misread. A P/E of 15 can be expensive for a shrinking business and a P/E of 40 cheap for a fast-growing one.

This guide is for investors who read company filings themselves. You will learn how to calculate P/E from a 10-Q, see the P/E of eight well-known companies at today's prices, compare industries, and see what six decades of data say about P/E and interest rates. You will finish with a five-minute context check you can run on any stock.

Key takeaways

  • P/E ratio = share price ÷ earnings per share over the last 12 months. Its inverse, the earnings yield, tells you how many cents of profit you buy with each dollar.

  • The S&P 500's year-end trailing P/E averaged 17.1× from 1960 to 2025, with a median of 17.4×, a low of 7.3× in 1974 and a high of 29.6× in 2001.

  • Industry matters more than any rule of thumb: in January 2026, large US banks traded at 14.2× trailing earnings and semiconductor companies at 48.8×.

  • Interest rates move the "normal" P/E: in years when the 10-year Treasury yield ended at 8% or more, the S&P 500 averaged 10.9×; at 4% to 6%, it averaged 19.9×.

  • Coca-Cola traded at 28.3× trailing earnings on November 4, 2026, 7.7% above the soft-drink industry's 26.3×, a modest premium rather than a bargain.

17.1×average S&P 500 trailing P/E at year-end, 1960–2025Source: Damodaran, NYU Stern (Jan 2026)
25.2×S&P 500 trailing P/E at the end of 2025Source: Damodaran, NYU Stern (Jan 2026)
14.2× vs 48.8×trailing P/E of large US banks vs semiconductor companiesSource: Damodaran industry data (Jan 2026)
28.3×Coca-Cola's trailing P/E at the November 4, 2026 closeSource: Coca-Cola 10-Q, SEC EDGAR; Intrinio price

What is a P/E ratio?

A P/E ratio, or price-to-earnings ratio, is a company's share price divided by its earnings per share (EPS). It tells you how many dollars investors pay for each $1 of the company's yearly profit. A P/E of 20 means investors pay $20 for $1 of earnings.

You can also work it out for the whole company: market value ÷ net income gives the same answer. See the P/E entry in our glossary for a short definition.

Definition

Earnings per share (EPS) is net income available to common shareholders divided by the number of shares. Use diluted EPS, which counts shares from options and convertible securities. Every 10-Q and 10-K reports it at the bottom of the income statement.

Trailing P/E vs forward P/E

There are two common versions, and you need to know which one you are looking at:

  • Trailing P/E (TTM, for trailing twelve months) uses the EPS a company actually reported over the last four quarters. It is a fact you can check in the filings.

  • Forward P/E uses analysts' forecast EPS for the next 12 months or the next fiscal year. It looks ahead but depends on estimates that can be wrong.

This guide uses trailing P/E throughout, because you can rebuild every number from SEC filings.

What is the earnings yield?

The earnings yield is the P/E turned upside down: EPS ÷ price, or 1 ÷ P/E. A P/E of 25 is an earnings yield of 4%. It is useful because you can set it next to a bond yield. When a stock's earnings yield is below the 10-year Treasury yield, you are accepting less profit per dollar today in return for expected growth.

What is a good P/E ratio?

A good P/E ratio is one that is low relative to the company's own industry, its own history and its growth, at the interest rates of the day. A P/E is only "good" or "bad" in comparison, never on its own.

For a quick sense of scale, the S&P 500's long-run average is the most common anchor. Across 66 year-ends from 1960 to 2025, its trailing P/E averaged 17.1× and the median was 17.4×. Since 1990 the average has been higher, at 19.7×. At the end of 2025 it was 25.2×.

A stock at 12× is cheap by that history and one at 30× is dear, before you ask why. The rest of this guide is about the why.

Watch out

A P/E only works when earnings are positive. A company with a loss has a negative P/E, which is not meaningful, not "very cheap". Most data sites show it as N/A.

How do you calculate a P/E ratio from a company's filings?

You calculate a trailing P/E by dividing today's share price by the diluted EPS of the last four reported quarters. If the latest filing is a 10-Q, add the year-to-date EPS to the last full-year EPS and subtract the same period from the year before:

  • TTM EPS = last fiscal year EPS + this year's year-to-date EPS − last year's year-to-date EPS

  • P/E = share price ÷ TTM EPS

  • Earnings yield = TTM EPS ÷ share price

Here is the full calculation for Coca-Cola, using its 10-Q for the quarter ended September 2026, filed with the SEC on October 28, 2026:

  1. Take last year's EPS. Coca-Cola's diluted EPS for fiscal 2025 was $3.04, from its 10-K.
  2. Add this year to date. Diluted EPS for the first nine months of 2026 was $2.86, from the 10-Q.
  3. Subtract the same months last year. Diluted EPS for the first nine months of 2025 was $2.51. TTM EPS = $3.04 + $2.86 − $2.51 = $3.39.
  4. Divide the price by TTM EPS. Coca-Cola closed at $95.80 on November 4, 2026. P/E = $95.80 ÷ $3.39 = 28.26×.
  5. Turn it into an earnings yield. $3.39 ÷ $95.80 = 3.54%, below the 10-year Treasury yield of 4.95% on November 3, 2026.
  6. Compare it. The soft-drink industry traded at 26.25× in Damodaran's January 2026 data, so Coca-Cola carried a 7.7% premium. Against the S&P 500's 25.21× at the end of 2025, the premium was 12.1%.

Using fiscal 2025 EPS alone would have given $95.80 ÷ $3.04 = 31.5×. That gap of more than three turns is why the EPS period matters: always check which 12 months a quoted P/E uses.

To see what a price move would mean for a position in dollars, run the numbers in our stock profit calculator.

What do real P/E ratios look like today?

Real P/E ratios for large US companies spread widely, from under 15× for JPMorgan Chase to over 400× for Tesla at the November 4, 2026 close. We calculated each one from diluted EPS in the companies' own SEC filings.

Trailing P/E of eight large US companies, November 4, 2026 close

Trailing P/E of eight large US companies, November 4, 2026 close Trailing twelve-month P/E at the November 4, 2026 close: JPMorgan Chase 14.77; Procter and Gamble 25.20; Nvidia 25.30; Coca-Cola 28.26; Microsoft 29.02; Apple 38.92; Walmart 46.80. Reference: S&P 500 trailing P/E at the end of 2025, 25.21. Tesla, at about 423, is off the scale and not shown. 0× 15× 30× 45× 60× JPMorgan 14.8× P&G 25.2× Nvidia 25.3× Coca-Cola 28.3× Microsoft 29.0× Apple 38.9× Walmart 46.8× S&P 500 25.2× (end-2025)
Source: TruthSayer AI calculation. Price: Nov 4, 2026 close, Cboe One via Intrinio. EPS: trailing 12 months of diluted EPS from each company's latest 10-K or 10-Q on SEC EDGAR (Nvidia to Jul 26, 2026; Walmart to Jul 31, 2026). S&P 500: Damodaran, year-end 2025. Tesla (about 423×) is off the scale; Ford had a trailing loss.

Three things stand out in the chart:

  • Nvidia at 25.3× traded below Coca-Cola at 28.3× on trailing earnings. A company known for fast growth does not always carry the highest P/E.

  • Walmart at 46.8× traded at a higher multiple than Microsoft (29.0×) or Apple (38.9×). A retailer's P/E is not automatically low.

  • Tesla at about 423× on TTM diluted EPS of $0.91 is off the scale, and Ford had a TTM diluted loss of $1.98 per share, so it had no meaningful P/E at all.

What is a good P/E ratio by industry?

A good P/E ratio by industry is one at or below that industry's typical multiple, because industries with steadier or faster-growing profits usually trade higher. In January 2026, the range ran from 11.3× for homebuilders to 48.8× for semiconductor companies.

Trailing P/E by US industry, January 2026

Trailing P/E by US industry, January 2026 Aggregate market value divided by trailing net income of money-making firms, January 2026: homebuilding 11.25; large money-center banks 14.17; integrated oil and gas 19.02; household products 19.66; general utilities 20.48; soft drinks 26.25; total US market 26.56; biotechnology 32.05; general retail 33.49; system and application software 37.52; semiconductors 48.81. 0× 15× 30× 45× 60× Homebuilding 11.3× Large banks 14.2× Integrated oil 19.0× Household goods 19.7× Utilities 20.5× Soft drinks 26.3× Total market 26.6× Biotech 32.1× General retail 33.5× Software 37.5× Semiconductors 48.8×
Source: Aswath Damodaran, Price and Value to Earnings by industry sector, NYU Stern (Jan 5, 2026). P/E = aggregate market cap ÷ trailing net income of money-making firms. Auto & Truck (119.6×) is off the scale.

Damodaran's numbers divide each industry's total market value by its total net income, counting only companies that made money. That is a fairer industry figure than a simple average, which a few firms with tiny profits can push very high. The share of money-losing firms is a reminder of how many companies a P/E screen silently drops:

Industry (Damodaran name)Trailing P/E, money-making firmsShare of firms losing moneyWhat drives the multiple
Bank (Money Center)14.2×7%Profits tied to credit cycles and rates
Oil/Gas (Integrated)19.0×0%Profits swing with oil prices
Household Products19.7×72%Steady demand, slow growth
Utility (General)20.5×0%Regulated, bond-like profits
Beverage (Soft)26.3×70%Strong brands, steady cash flow
Software (System & Application)37.5×70%High margins, fast growth
Semiconductor48.8×62%Fast growth with deep cycles
Auto & Truck119.6×82%Thin, volatile profits
Total US market26.6×57%All 5,994 firms in the dataset

The highlighted row is Coca-Cola's industry, used in the worked example above. The "what drives the multiple" column is our summary, not part of Damodaran's data. Note that these figures are from January 5, 2026, so they lag today's prices by ten months.

Does a good P/E depend on interest rates? Our research

Yes. In our analysis of 66 year-ends from 1960 to 2025, the S&P 500's trailing P/E was far lower when long-term interest rates were high. When the 10-year Treasury yield ended the year at 8% or more, the average P/E was 10.9×. When it ended between 4% and 6%, the average was 19.9×.

Average S&P 500 P/E by level of the 10-year Treasury yield, 1960–2025

Average S&P 500 P/E by level of the 10-year Treasury yield, 1960–2025 Average S&P 500 year-end trailing P/E grouped by the year-end 10-year Treasury yield, 1960 to 2025: below 4 percent, 18.66 over 20 years; 4 to 6 percent, 19.93 over 19 years; 6 to 8 percent, 15.94 over 16 years; 8 percent or more, 10.94 over 11 years. 0× 5× 10× 15× 20× 25× Below 4% 18.7× (20 years) 4% to 6% 19.9× (19 years) 6% to 8% 15.9× (16 years) 8% or more 10.9× (11 years)
Source: TruthSayer AI analysis of Aswath Damodaran, Historical Implied Equity Risk Premiums, NYU Stern (Jan 2026): year-end S&P 500 level ÷ trailing earnings, grouped by year-end 10-year Treasury yield. 66 year-ends.

A bond paying 10% competes hard with a stock earning 5% on its price, so investors pay less for earnings when rates are high. The decade averages agree:

PeriodAverage year-end P/EAverage 10-year Treasury yield
1960s17.6×4.63%
1970s12.1×7.49%
1980s12.1×10.23%
1990s20.2×6.39%
2000s19.3×4.16%
2010s17.5×2.39%
2020–202523.1×3.16%

The relationship is not tidy. The lowest-rate band (below 4%) averaged 18.7×, slightly less than the 4% to 6% band. Low rates in 2008 to 2012 came with fear: the P/E was 13.8× at the end of 2008 with a 2.21% yield, and 13.0× at the end of 2011 with a 1.88% yield. Rates set the ceiling for P/E; confidence in future earnings decides how close the market gets to it.

The data also shows that P/E can rise because earnings fall. The highest year-end P/E in the series, 29.6× in 2001, came as profits dropped in a recession, and the ratio rose to 18.7× at the end of 2009 for the same reason. A high P/E in a slump can mean depressed earnings, not an expensive market.

Pro tip

At the end of 2025, the S&P 500's earnings yield was 3.97% (1 ÷ 25.21) against a 10-year Treasury yield of 4.18%. When the market's earnings yield sits below the bond yield, investors are counting on growth. Check that a single stock's growth can justify the same bet.

What separates a good P/E from a bad one?

A good P/E is low for a business whose earnings are real, repeatable and growing. A bad P/E looks attractive on the surface but rests on weak, one-off or shrinking earnings. Use these bands as a starting point, then adjust for the industry:

Trailing P/EWhat it usually signalsCheck first
Negative or N/AThe company lost moneyUse cash flow, sales or book value instead
Under 10×Deep value or a business in troubleFalling sales, one-off gains, debt, peak-cycle profit
10× to 20×Around the market's long-run rangeIndustry average and 5-year growth
20× to 30×Quality or growth premiumWhether growth beats the premium you pay
30× to 50×High expectationsEarnings yield vs bonds, margin trend
Over 50×Very high growth, or very low earningsWhether earnings are temporarily depressed

The bands reflect the market's 1960–2025 range of 7.3× to 29.6×. They show where to start digging, not when to buy or sell.

How does P/E compare with other valuation ratios?

P/E is the quickest valuation ratio, but each alternative fixes one of its blind spots. Use P/E to screen, then confirm with a ratio that suits the company:

RatioFormulaBest forWeak spot
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ last 12 months' EPSProfitable, steady companiesUseless for losses; distorted by one-offs
Forward P/EPrice ÷ forecast EPSCompanies whose profits are changing fastRelies on analyst estimates
PEG ratioP/E ÷ expected EPS growth rate (%)Comparing growth companiesGrowth forecasts are often wrong
CAPE (Shiller P/E)Price ÷ 10-year average of inflation-adjusted earningsJudging the whole marketSlow; poor for timing
EV/EBITDAEnterprise value ÷ earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortizationComparing firms with different debtIgnores capital spending
Price-to-bookPrice ÷ book value per shareBanks, insurers, asset-heavy firmsMisses brands and software value
Free cash flow yieldFree cash flow per share ÷ priceChecking that profit turns into cashLumpy for companies with big projects

Illustrative example: a stock at 30× earnings with expected EPS growth of 15% a year has a PEG of 2.0. A stock at 20× with 5% growth has a PEG of 4.0. On PEG, the higher P/E looks cheaper, as long as the growth arrives.

Which P/E approach is best for you?

The right P/E approach depends on what you invest in and how much time you spend on each stock:

  • Best for beginners: trailing P/E against the industry. One division and one comparison catch most obvious overpricing.

  • Best for dividend and income investors: earnings yield against the 10-year Treasury yield. It shows what you give up by choosing a stock over a bond.

  • Best for growth investors: forward P/E and PEG. Trailing earnings understate fast-growing companies, so test the forecast instead.

  • Best for cyclical stocks (autos, steel, energy): P/E on average earnings across a cycle. A low P/E on peak profits is often the most expensive moment to buy.

  • Best for banks: P/E with price-to-book. Book value anchors a bank's worth in a way it does not for a software company.

What does checking a P/E cost, and how long does it take?

Checking a P/E costs nothing and takes about five minutes per stock. The 10-Q and 10-K are free on SEC EDGAR.

  • Quick check (2 minutes): read the P/E your broker or a free finance site shows. Confirm whether it is trailing or forward.

  • Filing check (5 to 10 minutes): rebuild TTM EPS from the latest 10-Q, as in the Coca-Cola example, and look for one-off items in the notes.

  • Full context check (20 to 30 minutes): add industry, history, rates and cash flow with the framework below.

What are the common P/E ratio mistakes?

The most common P/E mistakes come from comparing the wrong numbers or trusting earnings without reading where they came from:

  1. Treating a low P/E as cheap. A stock at 8× with shrinking profit can be dearer than one at 25× with growing profit.

  2. Comparing across industries. A bank at 14× and a software company at 37× were each close to their industry in January 2026.

  3. Mixing trailing and forward figures. Coca-Cola was 28.3× on TTM EPS and 31.5× on fiscal 2025 EPS at the same price.

  4. Ignoring one-off items. Asset sales, tax benefits and write-downs move net income. Read the notes before you trust the E.

  5. Using simple averages for industries. Damodaran's simple average trailing P/E for semiconductors was 100.2× in January 2026; the aggregate for money-making firms was 48.8×.

  6. Reading a negative P/E as a bargain. Ford's TTM loss of $1.98 per share means the ratio has no meaning.

Is a low P/E always a buy signal? The contrarian view

No. The common advice says to buy stocks with low P/E ratios and avoid high ones. Our view is that a P/E screen is a starting filter, and a strict one hides some of the best opportunities while flagging some of the worst.

  • The market's "normal" P/E moves. The year-end average was 12.1× in the 1980s and 23.1× from 2020 to 2025. A fixed cutoff such as "buy under 15" would have kept you out of most stocks for most of the last 30 years.

  • Low P/Es cluster at earnings peaks. Cyclical companies look cheapest when profits are highest, just before they fall. In our margin-of-safety research, free cash flow at Ford and Exxon Mobil went from positive to negative in a single year.

  • P/E cannot see companies without profits. In Damodaran's January 2026 data, 57% of the 5,994 US firms lost money over the trailing year, so they had no meaningful P/E at all.

Where the advice holds: among steady, profitable companies in the same industry, a lower P/E with similar growth usually is the better price. Use it there, and use something else everywhere else.

How should you judge a P/E? The TruthSayer P/E Context Check

The TruthSayer P/E Context Check is a five-step test that turns a bare P/E into a judgment. Run it in order; stop at any step that fails.

  1. Check the E. Confirm EPS is positive, diluted and from the last 12 months. Read the notes for one-off gains or charges. If earnings are negative or mostly one-off, stop and value the stock another way.
  2. Compare with the industry. Put the P/E next to its industry's aggregate P/E. More than 20% above it needs a clear reason, such as faster growth or higher margins.
  3. Compare with rates. Turn the P/E into an earnings yield and set it against the 10-year Treasury yield. The further below the bond yield it sits, the more growth you are paying for.
  4. Price the growth. Divide the P/E by the expected yearly EPS growth to get the PEG. Ask whether that growth fits the company's last five years of results in its 10-K filings.
  5. Confirm with cash. Check that free cash flow per share is at least close to EPS. Then estimate a value range and a buy-below price with our guides to intrinsic value and margin of safety.

Applied to Coca-Cola: EPS of $3.39 is positive, the premium to its industry is 7.7%, and its 3.54% earnings yield sits below the 4.95% bond yield, so steps 4 and 5 decide whether its growth justifies the price.

How does TruthSayer AI use P/E ratios?

TruthSayer's Valuations AI does not buy stocks because their P/E is low. It combines proprietary fair-value models with price action, institutional activity and fundamental financial data to find potentially mispriced US-listed stocks, and every signal is traded in a funded account before members see it.

Zscaler shows why that matters. Its diluted EPS for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2026 was a loss of $0.39 per share, according to its 10-K filed on September 3, 2026, so it had no meaningful P/E and any low-P/E screen would have skipped it. Valuations AI flagged it as undervalued and bought at $184.83 on August 14, 2026, then closed the trade at $230.72 on November 2, 2026, a 24.56% gain over 80 days.

One trade proves nothing, so judge the full record. As of November 5, 2026, the Valuations AI page shows a 78.33% return since inception against 34.36% for the S&P 500, a 72.9% win rate across closed stock trades and an average hold of 75 days. Losses happen too; the same trade list includes Beyond Air, closed at a 101.02% loss in September 2026. TruthSayer AI claims compliance with GIPS®, the global performance reporting standard; see our GIPS reports and verification.

How we chose

Company P/E ratios use the November 4, 2026 close and diluted EPS we calculated from each company's latest 10-K or 10-Q on SEC EDGAR. Industry and market figures are Damodaran's published data as of January 2026. The interest-rate bands are our own grouping of Damodaran's year-end S&P 500 earnings and 10-year Treasury data. Trade figures come from the published Valuations AI trade list.

What should you do after you check a P/E?

After you check a P/E, decide whether the stock deserves a full valuation. If the context check raises no red flags, estimate what the business is worth and how far below that you want to buy.

The bottom line: A good P/E ratio is one that is low for the company's industry, its growth and today's interest rates, not a fixed number. The S&P 500's 17.1× long-run average is a useful anchor, but industries ranged from 11× to 49× in January 2026, and the market's normal level has moved with rates for six decades. Run the TruthSayer P/E Context Check before you trust any P/E, and confirm the answer with cash flow.

Frequently asked questions

Is a P/E ratio of 15 good?

A P/E ratio of 15 is below the S&P 500's 1960–2025 year-end average of 17.1×, so it is cheaper than the market's history. Whether it is good depends on the industry: 15× was close to average for large banks (14.2×) in January 2026 but low for soft-drink makers (26.3×). Check that earnings are stable before calling it cheap.

Is a high P/E ratio good or bad?

A high P/E ratio is neither good nor bad on its own. It means investors expect profits to grow, or that current profits are temporarily low. It is bad when the expected growth does not arrive, because the price usually falls toward a lower multiple. Compare the P/E with the company's growth rate using the PEG ratio.

What is the average P/E ratio of the S&P 500?

The average year-end trailing P/E of the S&P 500 was 17.1× from 1960 to 2025, with a median of 17.4×, based on Aswath Damodaran's data at NYU Stern. Since 1990 the average has been 19.7×. At the end of 2025 it was 25.2×.

What does a negative P/E ratio mean?

A negative P/E ratio means the company lost money over the last 12 months, so the ratio has no useful meaning. Ford, for example, had a trailing diluted loss of $1.98 per share in late 2026. Value loss-making companies with sales, cash flow or book value instead, and check how long their cash will last.

Is a lower P/E ratio always better?

No. A lower P/E is better only when the earnings behind it are just as reliable and growing at a similar pace. Low P/Es often appear at the peak of a profit cycle or when a business is shrinking. Among similar, steady companies in the same industry, the lower P/E usually is the better price.

Should I use trailing or forward P/E?

Use trailing P/E as your base, because it rests on reported earnings you can check in 10-Q and 10-K filings. Add forward P/E for companies whose profits are changing quickly, but treat it as an estimate. If the two differ a lot, find out why before you rely on either one.

Sources

This article is for educational purposes only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

what is a good pe ratiope ratio
Joan Sacdalan

Joan Sacdalan

Joan specializes in financial data analytics, market intelligence, and investment research at TruthSayer AI. Her expertise spans fundamental and technical analysis, emerging market trends, and data-driven investment strategies, turning complex financial data into clear, actionable intelligence for risk-aware investors.

Newsletter

New articles and strategy updates, sent when they publish

Market insights from the Invest Like a Quant newsletter, straight to your inbox.